Description
It has been twenty years since the Supreme Court of Canada released its landmark decision in Baker v. Canada, laying the framework for procedural fairness in Canada, which still persists two decades later. Explore current issues in procedural fairness and its evolution post-baker with our expert panel.

PROGRAM CHAIRS

Ryan MacIsaac, McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Jean-Claude Killey, Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Essential Update on Procedural Fairness: 20 Years Post-Baker
Jean-Claude Killey, Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP
Ryan MacIsaac, McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Where Do We Stand on Procedural Fairness?
Brandon Kain, McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Émilie Bruneau, McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Where Do We Stand on Procedural Fairness?
Annotated List of (recent) Resources
Professor Kate Berger, University of Western Ontario

Evolution of the Requirement for Reasons
Kirsten Thoreson, Ontario Securities Commission

The Role of Reasons Without Reasonableness Review
Andrea Gonsalves, Stockwoods LLP

Hitting the Wall: Do Voluntary Organizations Have to be Fair?
Jordan Goldblatt, Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP

Case Comment: the Implications of Highwood Congregation for Political Parties
Michael Fenrick, Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP
Maryam Shahid, Paliare Roland Rosenberg Rothstein LLP