Ten Years Later: Coherence and Consistency in Administrative Practice Post-Dunsmuir
Author(s): Ontario Bar Association
Publication Date: February 2018
Format: download (PDF), shipped (hardcopy)


Description
To function well, our administrative law system requires a delicate balance between independence and oversight; flexibility and consistency. On this 10th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada's watershed decision in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, join us as we check in on the evolving law of standard of review, and attempts to enhance procedural and substantive consistency in administrative decision-making. Our expert faculty will get you up to speed on the latest developments, and provide insights on opportunities for improvement.

PROGRAM CHAIRS
Aaron Dantowitz
, Stockwoods LLP
Diane Janisse, Legal Aid Ontario - Clinic Resource Office

TABLE OF CONTENTS

How Has Dunsmuir Affected Substantive Review of Administrative Decision Makers by Lower Courts?
Professor Diana Ginn, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University
Professor William Lahey, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University

Can we make it any clearer?
BC's experience with legislated standards of review

Brent Olthuis, Hunter Litigation Chambers (Vancouver)

Reasonable, Correct, or Simply Fair?
Exploring the Standard of Review for Procedural Decisions

Andrea Gonsalves and Pam Hrick, Stockwoods LLP

Predictability in Tribunals
Gary Yee, Toronto Licensing Tribunals

  Ordering Information
All prices in CDN dollars

Members

Non-Members
 
  Your Cart

0 items in your cart
Total: $0.00